step 3.step 3. Speaking of Relationship Enjoy
1 / 2 of, 142 (51.3%), of participants indicated that they often mention their schedules having family. These are friends’ dates try conveyed by 159 (44.5%) of the respondents. A dramatically less area, 70 (24.9%), of your own respondents expressed commonly these are its times which have nearest and dearest members. One (0.4%) respondent indicated usually these are its dates which have educators gГ¶r ghanansk kvinnor gГҐr med amerikanska mГ¤n. Partners, cuatro (step one.4%), respondents expressed speaking of their schedules in the social networks ( Table step three ). Brand new distribution of the participants about your volume regarding these are its times was not regarding the place of residence or nearest and dearest status (p > 0.05). Participants with a low-heterosexual orientation more often shown commonly speaking of its dates (p = 0.039). Sexual positioning wasn’t with the speaking of times that have members of the family members, having coaches, or perhaps in social support systems, and there were similar outcomes for talking with family regarding friends’ dates (p > 0.05). Girls, more frequently than boys, conveyed these are the dates which have relatives and buddies professionals, along with talking to family unit members regarding the friends’ schedules (p 0.05).
Dining table 3
Most, 217 (57.6%), of one’s respondents indicated that when it comes to a terrible experience while in the a romantic date, they might speak about by using their friends. These are bad experiences along with their mother, father, sibling or sibling, or some other very important mature is actually expressed from the 165 (43.8%), 80 (21.2%), 80 (21.2%), and you will thirty two (8.5%) of your respondents, respectively. Speaking of negative feel with other individuals, along with doctors, grand-parents, teachers, personal specialists, and you may psychologists, and additionally speaking of bad feel from inside the social networks or helplines was indicated by lower than 5% of one’s attempt. An important part, 38 (ten.1%), of your own attempt detailed that they would not talk to someone about their bad matchmaking experiences. Girls revealed that they would speak about their negative experiences way more appear to employing parents, the brothers or sisters, or other very important grownups, whereas boys and you will teenagers together with other than heterosexual direction showed that they will explore the bad event with greater regularity with family relations (p 0.05).
Half, 111 (forty eight.1%), of one’s respondents revealed that the best age to start relationships and you may matchmaking are out of 15 so you’re able to 17 age, whereas 9 (step three.9%) respondents conveyed the best years to start relationship and you can relationships are out of 10 in order to fourteen ages. Girls, more often than boys, indicated an older years (p = 0.003). Sexual orientation and you can family members position just weren’t of the change in the feedback one of the popular appropriate age to start matchmaking and you may relationship.
One of many adolescents without relationship experience, almost all, 31 (42.5%), revealed that they don’t must big date but really, a dozen (sixteen.4%) revealed that they might look for somebody inside the internet sites, step three (4.1%) showed that they’d look for somebody at school, and twenty-seven (37.0%) revealed that they would look for a partner in other places than just in school or perhaps in social networking sites.
Most, 35 (fifty.7%), of one’s adolescents and no dating feel revealed that there clearly was no such as person they want to go out, 23 (33.3%) showed that there was such as for example a guy, plus the people, 11 (15.9%), of participants did not discover whether or not there clearly was such as for instance an effective people.
One of those who showed that there was one they would should big date, one-3rd, nine (33.3%), revealed that he could be afraid so you’re able to receive eg a guy, an equivalent part, 8 (30.6%), revealed that he’s waiting to getting invited from the like an effective individual, six (twenty two.2%) showed that they don’t can ask eg an effective people, and you will 4 (14.8%) expressed most other grounds.